Positivism

reason Feyerabend presents perhaps the closely radical extension of the post positive philosophy that is reflected both in its methodology of science and the personality of their critique of neo . In the latter(prenominal) under approach revealed two study neopozytyvistskyh dissertation: the dissertation of dedutsiyuvannya or compatibility theories and tenet unremittingoshi meanings of scathe at heart the various theories . Feyerabend demonstrates the want of the first of them, the unavoidableness of compatibility with the old immature speculation leads to a new theory of elimination , resulting in stagnation of scientific friendship.\nThe difficulties argon revealed to them , the dissertation Invariance abide by terms ( which is the structure of a blotto separation of the semiempirical and theoretical levels of noesis neo ). Criticizing this dissertation , Feyerabend adds popperivskiy roots theoretical bill nahruzhenosti popular. A reflectivity of this was an attempt to beg off the methodological utilisation of theoretical knowledge , which, according to him, is the mettle of theoretical pragmatism . It emphasizes the role of foundations finale perception and go steady in general whatever phenomenon : in that location can be no other(a) meaning of the terms specified in addition to the staple fibre provisions of a particular theory. Since apiece theory is characterized by a destine of initial postulates, pry their terms not only invariant , but comparable. and , because of the autonomy theories for separately desired manner of speaking testify observations. uncritical borrowing conflicting language and speech communication may injure of his activity . fit same nitty-gritty as a means of knowledge should be jilted .\nThus, Feyerabend antykumulyatyvist and acts as a proponent of the thesis of nesumirnist theories. Existing theories, in his opinion, often mutually contradictory because of the feature that esta blish their sustain standards and norms.\nA definitive framework of a situation depict by P. Feyerabend - differences in definitions molecule chemistry ( chemical individualization carrier substance) and corporeal science ( molecular spectrum ). either and approach of natural philosophy and chemistry to diagnose a be of complex physical and chemical functiones. However, for example , determine the deal , power, volume and so on. identical in both the sciences as well as thermodynamics , etc. Therefore, the idea put beforehand by the philosopher seems besides categorical .\nKrytykuyemym theses Feyerabend opposes poliferatsiyi own principles - reproduction - scientific theories and kontrynduktsiyi . The first is reflected in the fact that the conflict theory of scientific fact to rebut it need to a greater extent theory , and any idea that is introduced in such a way as to be reassert . Science appears as a process of reproduction theories and allows for the coexist ence of the many another(prenominal) types of peer knowledge. The front end of a universal method of scholarship Feyerabend denied. The criteria of rationality ar not absolute, they are relative, and there is none that would be delicious everywhere.